{"id":1466,"date":"2016-07-12T21:22:56","date_gmt":"2016-07-12T20:22:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/?p=1466"},"modified":"2017-01-02T01:03:41","modified_gmt":"2017-01-02T00:03:41","slug":"justified-by-works","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/2016\/07\/justified-by-works\/","title":{"rendered":"Justified by works"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"intro\">\n\t\t\tSome thoughts I wrote as part of a private discussion a few years back, about work and the value of human beings.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p><lj-cut>I read a thing the other day: [that is, back in April 2012]\n\t\t<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\n\t\tFrench-Israeli sociologist <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eva_Illouz\" title=\"Wikipedia page on Eva Illouz\">Eva Illouz<\/a> has argued that early in the twentieth century, massive efforts were made to convince people to act upon self-interest.  The attitudes that now seem self-evident were deliberately encouraged by psychologists hired to cultivate the qualities corporate capitalism needs.  After examining texts from training manuals to self-help books, she concludes that psychologists, acting simultaneously as professionals and as producers of culture, have not only codified emotional conduct inside the workplace but, more crucially, made self-interest, efficiency, and instrumentality into valid cultural repertoires.  Throughout the twentieth century, under the aegis of therapeutic discourse, emotional life became imbued with the metaphors and rationality of economics.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\tIllouz&#8217;s conclusions may seem extreme unless you recall that dueling was a social practice that persisted into the twentieth century.  To be a man was to draw a weapon if you were insulted, not to exercise emotional control in pursuit of self-interest.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\tRemembering a world driven by ideas of honor is not, of course, to plead for a return to dueling.  It is to suggest that the view of a world driven solely by self-interest is itself a product of history &#8211; and of very particular interests.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t<span class=\"quote-source\">&#8211; Susan Neiman, <em class=\"citetitle\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/2737476-moral-clarity\">Moral Clarity<\/a><\/em><\/span>\n\t\t<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SelfInterest.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SelfInterest.jpg\" alt=\"Quote: &quot;... the view of a world driven solely by self-interest is itself a product of history - and of very particular interests.&quot; - Susan Neiman.\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>[<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eva_Illouz\">More on the work of Eva Illouz<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\tI take this as pointing to <strong>people LEARNING to relate to themselves as products and producers<\/strong>, which is the view of ourselves most convenient to capitalism, and gradually constructing that as the <strong>default framework for mainstream culture<\/strong>.  (This is reminding me too of the writer Tom Peters and his enthusiasm for &#8220;being your own brand&#8221; etc.)\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\tIn the quote, that&#8217;s contrasted with the &#8220;honour&#8221; framework, but I think it could also be contrasted with a framework in which <strong>humans need no justification for our existence<\/strong> &#8211; a kind of innate sacredness of human beings (and the rest of the natural world too), regardless of our &#8220;productivity&#8221;.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\tIt reminds me of how some Christian traditions believe in being redeemed by works, whereas some believe in being redeemed by faith, and some by grace.  That&#8217;s debated territory, and each of those belief systems has its own implications.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\tThere&#8217;s also the phrase &#8220;Protestant work ethic&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not sure where that originates historically, and how it relates to the creation of the capitalist framework.  I think I still live in some version of it, though.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\tIt&#8217;s not that I think I&#8217;d want to sit around doing nothing for the rest of all time&nbsp;:-)  I think the sheer joy of acting on the world is an innate pleasure which humans (usually?) have naturally when in good health.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\tBut there&#8217;s a difference between acting on the world out of sheer joy and acting on the world in order to justify your existence.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\tIn a capitalist framework such as I&#8217;m rejecting here, there is no point to the existence of people who can&#8217;t <strong>&#8220;be productive&#8221; in commercial terms<\/strong>.  In the UK at the moment, there&#8217;s a terrible example of the &#8220;logical conclusion&#8221; of that, in the way in which disabled people are being treated by the current government:  suicides and deaths-from-stress because the disability benefits regime has become so much more punitive and unworkable.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\t\t\tOne way to deal with that terrible &#8220;logical conclusion&#8221; is to make a special exception for people who &#8220;can&#8217;t&#8221;.  But I think what&#8217;s ethically preferable is, as some famous philosopher* said, <strong>to treat all people as ends in themselves and not means to ends<\/strong>.\n\t\t<\/p>\n<p class=\"note\">\n\t\t\t* <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/ethics\/introduction\/endinitself.shtml\">It was Kant<\/a>.\n\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Work and the value of human beings. From 2012.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1467,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,25,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ethics","category-ontology","category-quotes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1466"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1466\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1505,"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1466\/revisions\/1505"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uncharted-worlds.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}